King Charles’ “Baphomet” Lake-of-fire Portrait

More people have died or have been killed during the lifetime of this king than during the entire known human calamity, er condition, combined.

King Charles’ ‘Baphomet in Lake of Fire’ Portrait

Presumably this was commissioned from among choicest artists with intention of being displayed for centuries to come.  Does it depict one mired in blood and fire muck, but emerging (barely) with clarity?  Does it attempt to convey a sense of having done some grander duty?  A nobility transcending shame?

The Lifetime & Reign of King Charles: A Dark Examination of Eugenics, Depopulation, and Technocracy

The ascension of King Charles to the British throne has reignited discussions about the royal family’s historical and contemporary influence on global affairs. Particularly concerning are the ties to eugenics, depopulation strategies, and the emerging technocratic control over populations. This post examines these aspects in detail, shedding light on the sinister undertones that have marked certain phases of his reign.

The Eugenics Background

Eugenics, the pseudo-scientific belief in improving the genetic quality of the human population, has an unsettling history within many elite circles, including the British monarchy. The concept, which gained traction in the early 20th century, advocated for selective breeding and sterilization to eliminate undesirable traits. Although modern discussions on eugenics have largely been discredited, the shadows of its ideology persist.

King Charles, through various public and private en

deavors, has shown an interest in environmental sustainability and population control, which some interpret as a modern guise for eugenics. His advocacy for organic farming and climate change initiatives, while seemingly benign, often intersects with discussions on controlling human populations to reduce environmental impact.

Depopulation by War and Famine

Historically, war and famine have been devastating tools for population control. Under King Charles’s reign, these themes have been brought to the fore, not through direct action but through the support of policies and alliances that perpetuate conflict and resource scarcity.

– **War:** Military engagements and geopolitical strategies often supported by the British government can indirectly lead to significant population reductions. The arms trade, conflicts in the Middle East, and proxy wars contribute to a continuous state of unrest, displacing millions and resulting in countless deaths.

– **Famine:** Economic policies and climate initiatives sometimes exacerbate food insecurity in developing nations. The promotion of biofuels, for instance, has diverted food crops to fuel production, leading to higher food prices and scarcity in vulnerable regions.

Mass Inoculation Versus Plague

The global response to pandemics has always been a contentious issue. During King Charles’s reign, mass inoculations against diseases like COVID-19 have sparked debates about public health versus individual freedom.

While vaccines are essential for controlling pandemics, the rapid rollout and mandates have raised concerns about state overreach and the ethics of mass medical interventions. Critics argue that such measures can be used to exert control over populations, with health crises providing a pretext for more invasive surveillance and data collection.

Big Brother Technocracy and Directed Energy Weapons

The advent of advanced technologies has ushered in an era of unprecedented surveillance and control. King Charles’s reign has seen the expansion of what many term the “Big Brother” state, where technology is used to monitor and influence public behavior.

– **Technocracy:** The rise of a technocratic governance model, where decisions are made by technical experts rather than elected representatives, aligns with the royal family’s historical penchant for influence over state affairs. This model prioritizes efficiency and control, often at the expense of democratic freedoms.

– **Directed Energy Weapons:** Among the most concerning developments are the advances in directed energy weapons (DEWs). These systems, capable of causing harm from a distance without traditional explosives, represent a new frontier in warfare and population control. Theories suggest that DEWs could be used to target dissenting individuals or groups, maintaining control through fear and precision strikes.

Conclusion

King Charles’s reign, marked by these dark undertones, reflects a complex interplay of historical ideologies and modern technologies. While many of his initiatives can be viewed through a positive lens of sustainability and public health, the underlying themes of control and population management cannot be ignored. As society grapples with these issues, it remains crucial to maintain a vigilant watch over how power is exercised and to whom it ultimately serves.

When there should have been ‘step up’ to higher vibration and righteousness, every time has been degradation, devaluation and devolution lowering all into the Abyss.  In a world of abundance, the entire living population of which can easily fit into the U.S. State of Texas at a population density of present-day New York City, the greed of a few has taken and been given sway, to the great harm of most.  No such future of Evil, enabled by anything, will stand, indellibly marking those at the helm of wrongdoing.