Eyeballing Tom Montalk as a shill
Somehow, some 24 years ago, a presently 20-something guy offered a 600-page book and promptly cannon-launched a pro-quality revamped website (of an even earlier one!) that hasn’t changed since. “Something seems Very fishy here, at the very least substantially boosted / ‘helped along’.”
We know there are paid shills and crisis actors. It’s a legit question: “Where does funding come from for Carlwood and Montalk?”. Montalk looks like he is in his late 20s. archive.org Wayback Machine is showing a pretty thick montalk.net website from the earliest days back in 2001 with references to angelfire before that — that’s 24 years ago – the guy was like what 10 yo? ?? Something seems Very fishy here, at the very least substantially boosted / ‘helped along’. What gives? Plain, simple questions get immediately removed and/or attacked.
It’s 2025 now. “TOM” appears to be maybe in his late 20s, strangely reminiscent of David Hogg crisis-actor and gun-grabber.
archive.org is showing a pretty thick montalk.net website back in April 2003, 22 years ago, when “TOM” was pre-teen.
https://web.archive.org/web/20030408221718/http://www.montalk.net/
A year prior, a 600-page book (!) was already being promoted/offered in May 2002, when “TOM” was, what?, 5 years old? ???
https://web.archive.org/web/20020602205136/http://www.montalk.net/
20 Months Later, April 2006, montalk.net was reworked into a polished look that has remained unchanged since — two Highly Unusual facts
https://web.archive.org/web/20060402200634/http://www.montalk.net/
Given these some seeming and many verifiable facts and I am extremely suspicious of this character, the website, and consequently the information and agenda. It remains most likely that ‘we are the “aliens”‘. If there was truth to it, where is solid evidence? Why the constant provable weird actors and oddball goings-on? It seems more an overall orchestration to make case for exo-aliena than not; therefore, likelihood remains not.
“Tom Montalk”, another shill, another tool in the grand deception, outed by simple, verifiable, self-conflicting facts.
