2011 book documents the known, accepted and very little more. Left completely untouched are the several extremely intriguing anomalies of the shooting —
- Contemporary reports do say Neil Bush was scheduled to have dinner with Scott Hinckley, John Hinckley Jr.’s brother, the following night according to Dallas newspaper article.
- Somebody shot Reagan, and the bullet was not from Hinckley’s gun. CIA monster GHW Bush was VP; was this an attempted power-grab? Was it literally a ‘warning shot’? (Remember how Obama was later supposedly ‘almost poisoned’, or shot by the very extremely exceedingly unlikely ‘White House party crashers’.)
- DC is overwhelmingly a black umbrella town. That a vibrant red/blue umbrella was deployed — and underneath a rain-blocking portcullis amidst light mist — is unsual on every level. It seems far more likely to have been a ‘proceed with shooting’ signal; compare to ‘Umbrella Man’ at Dealey Plaza / JFK — and given GHW Bush involvement there also, well, same operators, same Modus Operandi?
- The gun-grab-agenda furthered by James Brady’s “accidental” head-wound was unlikely accidental.
- Reagan was first US President whose inauguration was made facing the Washington Monument obelisk, said by Jesuit Alberto Rivera to signal essentially that ‘church takeover by Vatican’ was complete.
- Reagan (reagent, regenerate) 1984 recognition of the Holy See (Vatican) reversed a century-old U.S. diplomatic rupture rooted largely in anti-Catholic suspicion after the Civil War, owing to the fact that all the “conspirators” who were hung by the US Military were in fact Catholic, and that escaped conspirator John Surratt was given refuge and asylum by the Vatican.
A book NOT talking about those most egregious anomalies is likely unworth investment.
