Baltimore Key Bridge #102 – Deeper. Earlier.

“This was a trillion-dollar costly event, ongoing, and yet all culpable persons remain unnamed, kept totally anonymous, with some reportedly having been slyly ‘escaped’ from the country! There is, in fact, zero publicly-verifiable evidence that any genuine Captain, Pilots or Crew ever existed; was DALI a remote-controlled ghost-ship on kamikazee mission from its outset? No waves nor sounds at all were recorded nor reported by any nearby persons nor cameras. No interviews exist with supposed survivors; “family and friends” etc interviews reveal ‘dupers-delight’ micro-facial-expressions with other hallmarks suggestive of fraud. Rampant is the extremely suspicious damage with blatantly visible, verifiable anomalies totally inexplicable (and ignored) by official theory or story. Grand payola galore is already underway with loads more coming. This is another audacious yet sublime crime, militarized from gov to salvage to rebuild. There was no rescue skiff on scene as required by OSHA. No horn blasts from ship warned of imminent collision. The ship departed despite dire electrical problems, illegal at any time and even more highly unusual in the cold, dark night-time (part #94, first ‘after-sundown departure’ in two years). Criminal was this manufactured event, through and through, and that’s before considering the absurdly high number of other anomalies including the complicit, worthless, ‘kept-pet’ mass-media…”

Part #91 adapted from a video comment

Index . Oddity List . Official Story . Summary

Baltimore Key Bridge #102 – Deeper. Earlier.

Same families. Same intrigues.

1 Jesuits control Raytheon (per ERIC777 youtuber).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxlXK3T6R1M
2 Raytheon makes DEW weaponry.
https://reddit.com/r/JesuitWorldOrder
3 Jesuit motto: “Go forth and set the world on fire.”
4 DEW weaponry increasingly implicated in phyres.

    I had Adventure Academy for homeschool and they provided Latin and Greek – I told the kid that if he knew those root words that he could understand science and religion.

    I am slave in the Jesuit Slave Province of Maryland – that mission set sail to create a new world on Friday, November 22, 1633. I was born in Charm City – where a Sect of unwanted people have created the belief of the Nation. My last name is on the First Monument to the War Dead Since Ancient Tmes and The Mother Church erected The Father of The Motherland downtown, before they erected Lincoln in DC.

    I could tell stories for days, but the most important day in history is when they took the Original Founders beliefs and their flag and sold the Nation the American History story provided in Charm City and the flag that was created here.

    Nancy Pelosi’s father was in Congress when it was approved as the Nation’s pledge. He has a stadium in Israel for sending The Exodus in 1947. The Cross (symbol of death) + The Dream (an illussion + The Bridge = The Empire

    The Bridge collapsed the day after Maryland Day.

    Francis Scott Key was a founding member of the American Bible Society – taking the JESUIT Maryland Bible to a Federal level.

    In 1906, the Jesuit Jubilee delivered the Greek Gods to the B&O building in the center of the city. It delivered the Greek Universal Learning and Hospital-liar medical science of today. That is why Johns Hopkins sits in the Middle East of Baltimore. Great Bible Hoax of 1881.

    ABOVE: Comment from video —

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xg2fpVluRo

    A few miles west of Catholic bastion Baltimore is Daniels, Maryland, foothold of Vatican Jesuits in America.

    See also

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/ImQVP81EEqYQ — stunning reconsideration of American history with Jesuit intrigue included and considered as pivotal, instead of ignored / omitted.

    And also — DarkessIsFalling #360 ( https://rumble.com/v5ila6l-the-jesuit-vatican-shadow-empire-360-mary-land.html ), a stunning reconsideration of Maryland history explored from foothold of Jesuit intrigue.

    And —

    And —

    Baltimore Key Bridge #102 - Pelosi. Bible. Jesuits. FSK. Delving deeply, oddly.

    The “Great Bible Hoax of 1881” is a term that refers to controversies surrounding the publication of the Revised Version (RV) of the Bible in 1881. This revision was the first major update to the King James Version (KJV) since its publication in 1611. Critics labeled it a “hoax” because of the theological, textual, and political implications of the revision. Here’s a detailed look at the controversy and its broader context:


    Background of the Revised Version (RV)

    1. The Need for Revision
      By the 19th century, scholars recognized that the King James Version, while a cornerstone of English-speaking Protestant Christianity, contained translation errors and was based on late Greek manuscripts. Advances in textual criticism and access to older manuscripts like the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus revealed differences in the biblical texts.
    2. The Revisers
      The project was led by a group of British and American scholars, including prominent theologians like Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. Their work aimed to modernize the language and incorporate findings from older manuscripts.

    Controversies and Accusations

    1. Textual Criticism and the Westcott-Hort Theory
    • Westcott and Hort’s Influence:
      The revisers relied heavily on the textual theories of Westcott and Hort, who prioritized the oldest manuscripts (e.g., Codex Vaticanus) over the Textus Receptus, which had formed the basis for the KJV.
    • Criticism:
      Many conservative theologians accused Westcott and Hort of undermining the authority of the Bible by altering verses and omitting passages found in the KJV. Notable examples include the removal or modification of verses like 1 John 5:7 (the Comma Johanneum) and Mark 16:9-20.
    1. Theological Allegations
    • Critics accused Westcott and Hort of being influenced by liberal theology and secularism, suggesting they were undermining traditional Christian doctrines.
    • Some even claimed the revision was part of a broader conspiracy to dilute Christianity by introducing heretical ideas.
    1. Public Reaction
    • The RV’s release was met with widespread skepticism among lay Christians and clergy who were deeply attached to the KJV.
    • Some dubbed it the “Great Bible Hoax,” claiming that it was an attempt to impose a corrupt version of the Bible on the public.
    1. Impact on the KJV
    • Despite its controversies, the Revised Version gained some traction, particularly among scholars. However, it never replaced the King James Version as the dominant English translation for many Protestants.

    Key Elements of the “Hoax” Narrative

    • Manipulation of Scripture:
      Opponents alleged that the RV distorted Scripture by favoring manuscripts that they deemed unreliable.
    • Masonic and Occult Influence:
      Some conspiracy theorists suggested that revisers like Westcott and Hort were influenced by secret societies or occult practices, though there is little evidence to support these claims.
    • Propaganda Allegations:
      Critics argued that the revision was a deliberate effort to align Christianity with secular modernism, undermining its spiritual authority.

    Legacy of the Revised Version

    1. Scholarly Contribution
      While controversial, the RV marked a significant step in biblical scholarship, paving the way for later translations like the New International Version (NIV) and the English Standard Version (ESV).
    2. Enduring Controversy
      The debates surrounding the Revised Version persist in discussions of biblical textual criticism and the authority of modern translations versus the KJV.
    3. Cultural Significance
      The “hoax” narrative reflects the tension between tradition and progress in religious communities, illustrating the deep emotional and theological investment in sacred texts.

    Conclusion

    The “Great Bible Hoax of 1881” highlights the complexity of revising sacred texts. While the Revised Version sought to provide a more accurate translation based on ancient manuscripts, it inadvertently sparked accusations of heresy, conspiracy, and betrayal of Christian orthodoxy. It remains a pivotal moment in the history of biblical translation, symbolizing the delicate balance between scholarship and faith.


    Leave a Comment