“This was a trillion-dollar costly event, ongoing, and yet all culpable persons remain unnamed, kept totally anonymous, with some reportedly having been slyly ‘escaped’ from the country! There is, in fact, zero publicly-verifiable evidence that any genuine Captain, Pilots or Crew ever existed; was DALI a remote-controlled ghost-ship on kamikazee mission from its outset? No waves nor sounds at all were recorded nor reported by any nearby persons nor cameras. No interviews exist with supposed survivors; “family and friends” etc interviews reveal ‘dupers-delight’ micro-facial-expressions with other hallmarks suggestive of fraud. Rampant is the extremely suspicious damage with blatantly visible, verifiable anomalies totally inexplicable (and ignored) by official theory or story. Grand payola galore is already underway with loads more coming. This is another audacious yet sublime crime, militarized from gov to salvage to rebuild. There was no rescue skiff on scene as required by OSHA. No horn blasts from ship warned of imminent collision. The ship departed despite dire electrical problems, illegal at any time and even more highly unusual in the cold, dark night-time (part #94, first ‘after-sundown departure’ in two years). Criminal was this manufactured event, through and through, and that’s before considering the absurdly high number of other anomalies including the complicit, worthless, ‘kept-pet’ mass-media…”
Part #91 adapted from a video comment
Index . Oddity List . Official Story . Summary
Next takedown target?
Probably not because CBB pillar width allows two shipping channels for twice-as-fast bidirectional shipping.
Chesapeake Bay Bridge (CBB)
So many bridges strangely ‘failing’ all at once lately…is CBB in jeopardy also?
… or will CBB’s width allowing bi-directional shipping traffic spare it from “accidental” destruction?
FSK clearance height for container ships was 185 feet.
Chesapeake Bay Bridge clearance height for container ships is 186 feet.
One important difference: FSK supports were too narrow, already butting up against edges of shipping channel that is too narrow to allow bi-directional traffic of largest container ships. CBB is much wider without imposing limitations on bi-directional ship traffic.
Nevertheless, if the largest container ships need more than 186 feet clearance, the CBB will be done away with, too, probably by some perfect collision, perhaps this time by small aircraft, or perhaps a truck carrying explosive and/or caustic ingredients crashes on the main span, seriously damaging it. Just a guess.
